Mineral Wells Index, Mineral Wells, TX

Archive

December 13, 2007

Column: Endangered history of U.S. presidents

Bush order closes personal papers

If your holiday shopping this season finds you in a bookstore, take a moment and do me a favor. Ask for the section on presidential history, and go take a peek.

You’ll find literally hundreds of works of presidential history, from scholarly tomes with hundreds of footnotes to the downright silly works on presidential pets.

Now, take a moment and imagine 25 years from now, and you’re looking for a nice, complete history of the Clinton or Bush presidency.

What you find could be disappointing. The content may look and feel like history, but it could be missing important context. The books won’t contain background or reference to personal papers and once-classified memos detailing West Wing intrigue that for more than 200 years made the nation’s presidential history come to life.

This hollow history of the presidency will haunt us unless we wake up and do something about a records-censoring executive order issued by President George W. Bush in November of 2001.

The order gave presidents the right to prevent the release of their presidential papers – forever.

It also allows a sitting president to block the release of a former president's records, even if that president doesn’t object to the public disclosure of his personal papers. To challenge action taken under the order, historians, journalists and ordinary citizens must seek redress in court.

Historians, who know that our history begets our future, are outraged, and Congress has responded, though slowly. The House passed legislation to nullify President Bush’s order by the veto-proof margin of 333-to-93, with 104 Republicans breaking Administration ranks.

That bill was also well on its way to passage in the Senate when, on Sept. 24, Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., objected to floor consideration of the measure, automatically holding up a vote. Despite repeated requests from historical, news media and open government organizations, Bunning has refused to state the reasons for his opposition, which amounts to an act of legislative hostage taking.

Text Only
Featured Ads
Poll

Should vaping in public, such as in stores and restaurants, be treated the same as smoking, whether regulated privately by the business or by local governments?

Yes, vaping in public should be restricted like tobacco smoking.
No, vaping shaping should be allowed anywhere.
Not sure/undecided.
Don't care.
     View Results
Mineral Wells Index


Click on a photo to visit our SmugMug page

Front page
Weather Underground Radar
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
AP Video
Captain of Sunken SKorean Ferry Arrested Raw: Fire Destroys 3 N.J. Beachfront Homes Raw: Pope Presides Over Good Friday Mass Raw: Space X Launches to Space Station Superheroes Descend on Capitol Mall Man Charged in Kansas City Highway Shootings Obama Awards Navy Football Trophy Anti-semitic Leaflets Posted in Eastern Ukraine Raw: Magnitude-7.2 Earthquake Shakes Mexico City Ceremony at MIT Remembers One of Boston's Finest Raw: Students Hurt in Colo. School Bus Crash Raw: Church Tries for Record With Chalk Jesus Raw: Faithful Celebrate Good Friday Worldwide Deadly Avalanche Sweeps Slopes of Mount Everest Police Arrest Suspect in Highway Shootings Drought Concerns May Hurt Lake Tourism Vermont Goat Meat Gives Refugees Taste of Home Calif. Investigators Re-construct Fatal Bus Cras Mayor Rob Ford Launches Re-election Campaign Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
Must Read
Seasonal Content
Parade
Magazine

Click HERE to read all your Parade favorites including Hollywood Wire, Celebrity interviews and photo galleries, Food recipes and cooking tips, Games and lots more.
Stocks
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide