Mineral Wells Index, Mineral Wells, TX

Z_CNHI News Service

August 27, 2013

Little evidence to support murder charge against teens, lawyer says

DUNCAN, Okla. — The lawyer for a teen accused of first-degree murder in the Aug. 16 drive-by shooting of a college student says the charge is based solely on the flimsy statement of another teen.

Jim Berry, appointed to represent Chancey Luna, 16, said he doubts his client can get a fair trial in Oklahoma given the publicity surrounding the case that has drawn international attention, in part because the victim was an Australian citizen.

“I don’t think he can get a fair trial anywhere in the state of Oklahoma," said Berry, "and because of the national publicity, it’s going to be hard to get any venue” that is fair.

Prosecutors say Luna fired the .22-caliber revolver that shot Christopher Lane, 22, as he was jogging. Lane, 22, would have been a senior at East Central University in Ada and was visiting his girlfriend in Duncan.

James Edwards Jr., 15, whom prosecutors say was riding in the front passenger seat as Luna fired from the back seat, also faces a first-degree murder charge.

Prosecutors say Michael Dewayne Jones, 17, was driving and tried to cover up the crime. Prosecutors say Jones is the only one who has cooperated in their investigation. He is charged as an accessory.

Albert Hoch Jr., the Oklahoma City attorney appointed to represent Edwards, declined comment because a judge is considering a “gag order” to prohibit prosecutors and defense attorneys from talking publicly about the case. But Berry, interviewed Monday, said the only evidence is Jones' "suspect" statements.

“Just getting them on camera and calling them thugs is not evidence,” Berry said in reference to Stephens County District Attorney Jason Hicks' descriptions. "That’s as far as they have got it, and that is not evidence. It’s totally uncorroborated testimony of an alleged accomplice — that of Jones — and that’s not credible.”

Text Only
Z_CNHI News Service
Featured Ads
Poll

Should vaping in public, such as in stores and restaurants, be treated the same as smoking, whether regulated privately by the business or by local governments?

Yes, vaping in public should be restricted like tobacco smoking.
No, vaping shaping should be allowed anywhere.
Not sure/undecided.
Don't care.
     View Results
Mineral Wells Index


Click on a photo to visit our SmugMug page

Front page
Weather Underground Radar
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
AP Video
Obama Hopeful on Ukraine, Will Watch Russians Flamingo Frenzy Ahead of Zoo Construction Crew Criticized Over Handling of Ferry Disaster Agreement Reached to Calm Ukraine Tensions Raw: Pope Francis Performs Pre-easter Ritual Raw: Bulgarian Monastery Dyes 5000 Easter Eggs Diplomats Reach Deal to Ease Tensions in Ukraine U.S. Sending Nonlethal Aid to Ukraine Military Holder: Americans Stand With KC Mourners Obama Greets Wounded Warriors Malaysia Plane: Ocean Floor Images 'Very Clear' Sparks Fly With Derulo and Jordin on New Album Franco Leads Star-studded Broadway Cast Raw: Two Lucky Kids Get Ride in Popemobile Boston Bombing Survivors One Year Later Sister of Slain MIT Officer Reflects on Bombing
Must Read
Seasonal Content
Parade
Magazine

Click HERE to read all your Parade favorites including Hollywood Wire, Celebrity interviews and photo galleries, Food recipes and cooking tips, Games and lots more.
Stocks
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide