Mineral Wells Index, Mineral Wells, TX

Opinion

April 27, 2014

OPINION: Vote yes not just for the Baker, but for our future

In the four decades the Baker Hotel has been closed, many have dreamed about restoring and reopening the grand lady with visions of bringing back what used to be for the city.

We even got excited at times because a group here or an individual there actually came up with a proposal. But each time, optimism and hopes were dashed. The project was just too massive in scope and cost for most to undertake.

Over the last few years, our hopes again rose when we learned of a team of developers from the Metroplex who were looking for a project just like the Baker Hotel and fell in love with the building. Surely, we thought, we shouldn’t get our hopes up again only to once again be led to the trough of disappointment. We have tasted that water before. We thought, “This will surely be another failed attempt, but thanks for trying.”

Now, here we stand. Beginning Monday, the people of Mineral Wells can cast a ballot to approve or deny the last piece of funding – $4 million – needed for the projected $56 million renovation project. The other funding sources have been identified. Those monies are not secured or guaranteed at this point. But “the pieces of the puzzle,” as City Manager Lance Howerton says, are identified.

The people of Mineral Wells hold one of those puzzle pieces. An important piece. In fact, should the May 10 proposition authorizing the creation of a 4B Economic Development Corporation that would dedicate one-eighth of a cent of the city’s 1.5-cent sales tax levy to an economic development fund fail, the Baker Hotel project likely fails with it.

This is the moment we have waited a long time for, and now it is upon us. Is there some financial risk to the city and people? One could argue anytime you borrow large amounts of money there exists a risk in the ability to repay. But keep in mind the repayment of the loan comes solely from the reallocation of a portion of sales tax revenue, no other city revenue source. Not property taxes. If approved, the city would start the reallocation this fall, collecting those funds generated by the one-eighth cent and placing them in the separate fund for possibly a year or longer before the city would be asked to provide its $4 million contribution to the project.

Text Only
Opinion
Featured Ads
Mineral Wells Index


Click on a photo to visit our SmugMug page

Front page
Seasonal Content
AP Video
13 Struck by Lightning on Calif. Beach Baseball Hall of Famers Inducted Israel, Hamas Trade Fire Despite Truce in Gaza Italy's Nibali Set to Win First Tour De France Raw: Shipwrecked Concordia Completes Last Voyage Raw: Sea Turtle Hatchlings Emerge From Nest Raw: Massive Dust Storm Covers Phoenix 12-hour Cease-fire in Gaza Fighting Begins Raw: Bolivian Dancers Attempt to Break Record Raw: Israel, Palestine Supporters Rally in US Raw: Air Algerie Flight 5017 Wreckage Virginia Governor Tours Tornado Aftermath Judge Faces Heat Over Offer to Help Migrant Kids Kangaroo Goes Missing in Oklahoma More M17 Bodies Return, Sanctions on Russia Grow Raw: Deadly Tornado Hits Virginia Campground Ohio State Marching Band Chief Fired After Probe Raw: Big Rig Stuck in Illinois Swamp
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Stocks
Parade
Magazine

Click HERE to read all your Parade favorites including Hollywood Wire, Celebrity interviews and photo galleries, Food recipes and cooking tips, Games and lots more.
Must Read