An unfair fight for job seeking veterans has become increasingly evident on the jobs front. Unemployment among the youngest generation has remained stubbornly above national averages for the last five years. Employers say they want to hire veterans, but rely more and more on computer systems that routinely filter out military job titles and skills in favor of familiar phases. Its a language barrier between troops who have worn their resumes on their sleeves and a civilian hiring system that doesn’t know a captain from a colonel.
Researchers from the Institute for Veterans and Military Families at Syracuse University, say that’s not just a reintegration headache for veterans and their families. In a recent strategy paper, they argued that those types of problems represent the first cracks in the nation’s fragile promise to honor the sacrifices of the newest generation of service members.
Veterans without jobs are more likely to succumb to depression, struggle with substance abuse, ignore post traumatic stress disorder and end up living on the streets. Veterans who find civilian sector jobs are more likely to speak proudly of their military service and encourage their children to sign up. A lot of the problems exist from resume writing and not transferring the right verbiage on an application to create a desire by the employer to interview.
The military does not have resume writing tips in its transitions assistance programs, which veterans groups grumble saying the advice is too broad based and basic to really help in civilian job searches. One of the biggest problems seen with potential employees looking for jobs is skipping over employment buzzwords in the resumes such as the word command, opposed to manage or supervise. If applying for a project managers job and using the military job description, their is large disadvantage. Recruiters don’t have time to review every resume that comes across their desk. They need to see clear and concise language that shows the comparison in civilian terms.